ABD-RABBO, M. Anaphoric relations in topic-comment structure in modern standard Arabic, unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.

AMRITAVALLI, R. «Anaphorization in Dravidian», CIEFL Working Papers in Linguistics, 1-1.

ANDERSON, S. «Kwakwala syntax and the government-binding theory», in E.-D. Cook & D. B. Gerdts (eds.), The syntax of native American languages (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 16), Orlando: Academic Press.

BARSS, A. Chain binding, unpublished manuscript, Cambridge, MA: MIT.

BARTLETT, E. J. «Anaphoric reference in written narratives of good and poor elementary school writers», Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 50-552.

BLANCHE-BENVENISTE, C. Pronom et syntaxe. L'approche pronominale et son application au français, Paris: Selaf.

von BREMEN, K. «Anaphors: reference, binding and domains», Linguistic Analysis 14: 191-229.

BRESNAN, J. «Bound anaphora on functional structures», Invited Paper Presented at 10th Berkeley Linguistic Conference, February 17, 1984.

CHIERCHIA, G. «Anaphoric properties of infinitives and gerunds», in M. Cobler, S. Mackaye & A. Waestcaot (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.

CLIFFORD, T. H. Acquisition of pronouns in the first language acquisition of English: a study of Nnatural speech, unpublished Master Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca.

COHEN, R. «A computational theory of the function of clue words in argument understanding», in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'94).

DANON-BOILEAU, L. «That is the question», in F. Atlani, J.-L. Lebrave & A. Grésillon (éds.), La Langue au ras des textes, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.

DUNIN-KEPLICZ, B. «Default reasoning in anaphora resolution», in Proceedings ECAI, Pise 1.

FALK, Y. N. Grammatical configurations and grammatical relations, PhD, thesis, University of California.

FOX, B. Discourse structure and anaphora in written and conversational English, PhD, thesis, University of California.

FRADIN, B. «Anaphorisation et stéréotypes nominaux», Lingua 64: 325-369.

FRADIN, B. «Hypothèses sur la forme de la représentation sémantique des noms», Cahiers de lexicologie 44: 63-83.

FREDERINKSEN, N. «Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving», Review of Educational Research 54-3 : 363-407.

GIORGI, A. «Towards a theory of long distance anaphors: a GB approach», The Linguistic Review 4: 307-362.

HAEGEMAN, L. «Remarks on adverbial clauses and definite NP-anaphora», Linguistic Inquiry 15-4 : 712-715.

HAIK, I. «Indirect binding», Linguistic Inquiry 15: 185-223.

HAJICOVA, E. et alii «Topic, focus and how to identify them», in Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistichen Linguistik, 25, Groningue.

HAWKINS, J. A. «A note on referent identifiability and co-presence», Journal of Pragmatics 8: 649-659.

HELLWIG, P. «Grundzüge einer Theorie des Textzusammenhangs», in A. Rothkegel & B. Sandig (eds.), Text - Textsorten - Semantik. Linguistische Modelle und maschinelle Verfahren, Hamburg: H. Buske Verlag.

HORN, L. «Toward a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implacature», in D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic Applications, Georgetown: University Press.

HUANG, C. T. J. «On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns», Linguistic Inquiry 15, 4.

JAKUBOWICZ, C. «On markedness and binding principles», in C. Jones & P. Sells (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 14, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

KAMEYAMA, M. «Subjective/logophoric bound anaphor Zibum», in J. Drogo, V. Mishra & D. Testen (eds.), CLS 20: Papers from the Twentieth Regional Meeting.

KAYNE, R. Connectedness and binary branching, Dordrecht: Foris.

KEMPSON, R. «Pragmatics, anaphora and logical form», in D. Shiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context, Georgetown: University Press.

KLEIBER, G. «Sur la sémantique des descriptions démonstratives", Linguisticae Investigiones 8-1: 63-85.

KOSTER, J. «On binding and control», Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417-459.

KOSTER, J. «Reflexives in Dutch», in J. Guéron, H.-G. Obenauer & J.-Y. Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation no 22 in studies in generative grammar, Dordrecht: Foris.

LAPPIN, S. «VP anaphora, quantifier scope, and logical form», Linguistic Analysis: 13-4: 273-216.

LEBEAUX, D. [1983] «Anaphoric binding and the definition of PRO», in C. Jones & P. Sells (eds.), Papers From the 14th Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachussetts.

LUST, B.; CHIEN, Y.-C. & MANGIONE, L. «First language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese: constraints on free and bound null anaphora», in S. Hattori & K. Inoue (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Linguistics, Gakushuin, Tokyo.

MAILING, J. «Non-clause-bounded reflexives in modern Icelandic», Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211-241.

MARSCH, W. & PARTEE, B. H. «How non-context-free is variable binding?», in M. Cobler, S. Mackaye & M. Wescoat (eds.), Proceedings of the West Conference on Formal Linguistics III.

MERLINI BARBARESI, L. «Approaches to a pragmatic categorization of discourse», in S. E. George (ed.), From the linguistic to the social context, Bologna: Clueb.

MILNER, J. - C. Recherches sur l'anaphore, Cahiers de l' ERA 642, D.R.L., Université Paris VII.

MOHANAN, K. P. «On locally bound anaphora», Linguistic Analysis 13-4: 329-332.

MOHANAN, K. P. «Operator binding and the path containment condition», Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 357-396.

MONTALBETTI, M. After binding: on the interpretation of pronouns, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

PARTEE, B. H. «Temporal and nominal anaphora», Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243-286.

PICA, P. «Subject, tense and truth: towards a modular approach to binding», in J. Guéron, H.-G. Obenauer & J.-Y. Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation no 22 in studies in generative grammar, Dordrecht: Foris.

PICA, P. «Liage et contigüité», in J.-C. Milner (éd.), Recherches sur l'anaphore... [Reprinted in A. M. Di Sciullo & A. Rochette (eds.) (1990), Binding in Romance. Essays in honour of Judith McA'Nulty, Special Issue of Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, Ottawa].

PICA, P. «On the distinction between argumental and non-argumental anaphors», in W. de Geest & Y. Putseys (eds.), Sentential complementation, Dordrecht: Foris.

REINHART, T. Anaphora and semantic interpretation, London: Croom Helm Press.

RICHARDS, B. «On interpreting pronouns», Linguistics and Philosophy 7-3 : 287-324.

SAFIR, K. «Multiple variable binding», Linguistic Inquiry 15: 603-638.

SAG, I. A. & HANKAMER, J. «Toward a theory of anaphoric processing», Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 325-345.

SAITO, M. «On the definition of C-command and government», in C. Jones & P. Sells (eds.), Proceedings of North Linguistics Society 14: 402-417.

SAXON, L. «Disjoint anaphora and the binding theory» in M. Cobler, S. MacKaye & M. Wescoat (eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, vol. 3, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Department of Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association.

SCHIFFMAN, R. J. «The two nominal anaphors It and That», in J. Drogo, V. Mishra & D. Testen (eds.), Papers from the Twentieth Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

SCHRIFFIN, D. Meaning, form, and use in context : linguistic applications, Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press.

SELLS, P. Syntaxe and semantics of resumtive pronouns, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

STRAGE, A. A. Children's mastery of co-reference restrictions on pronominal and null anaphora, Ph. D.

TAO, L. Clause linkage and zero anaphora in Mandarin Chinese, PhD, thesis, University of California.

YANG, D.-W. «The extended binding theory of anaphors», Theoretical Linguistics Research 1: 195-218

Last modified: 10/21/2010