Anaphora 1982
< Previous :: Anaphora Index :: Next >

AGAR, M. & HOBBS, J. «Interpreting discourse: coherence and the analysis of ethnogaraphic interviews», Discourse Processes 5-1: 1-32.

ALLAIRE, S. Le système syntaxique des systèmes corrélatifs. Etude en français moderne, Université de Lille III.

ANDERSON, S. «Types of dependency in anaphors: Icelandic (and other) reflexives», Journal of Linguistic Reseach 2: 1-22.

ANDREWS, A. «Long distance agreement in Modern Icelandic», in P. Jacobson & G. Pullum (eds.), On the nature of syntactic representation, Dordrecht: Reidel.

AOUN, J. The formal nature of anaphotic relations, Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.

BELLETI, A. «On the anaphoric status of the reciprocal construction in Italian», Linguistic Review, 2.

BERWICK, R. & WEXLER, K. «Parsing, efficiency, binding and C-command», in D. Flickinger, M. Macken & N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford.

BRESNAN, J. «Control and complementation», Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343-434.

BÜHLER, K. «The deictic field of language and deictic words», in R. Jarvella, & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action...

CARDEN, G. «Backwards anaphora in discours context», Journal of Linguistics 18: 361-387.

CHOMSKY, N. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

DORON, E. «On the syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns», Texas Linguistic Forum 19: 1-48.

DEUTSCH, W. & KOSTER, J. «Children's interpretation of sentence internal anaphora», Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 21: 39-45.

EHLICH, E. «Anaphora and deixis: same, similar, or different?», in R. Jarvella, & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action...

EVANS, G. The varieties of reference, Oxford: University Press.

FODOR, J. & SAG, I. «Referential and auantificational indefinites», Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355-398.

GARROD, S. & SANFORD, A. J. «The mental representation of discourse in a focussed memory system: implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases», Journal of Semantics 1: 21-41.

GARROD, S. & SANFORD, A. J. «Topic dependant effects in the language processing», in Flores d'Arcais & R. J. Jarvella (eds.), The process of language understanding, New York: Wiley.

GREWENDORF, G. «Deixis und Anaphorik im deutschen Tempus», Papiere zur Linguistik 26: 47-83.

HAMP, E. P. «The anaphora <sup>*</sup> El in Latin», American Journal of Philology 103-1 : 98-99.

HEIM, I. R. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases, (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts), Papiere des Sonderforchungsbereich 99 Linguistik, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz.

HEIM, I. R. «File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness», in R. Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, use and the interpretation of language, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

HELLAN, L. «Semantic and functional government of reflexives in Norwegian», in T. Freiheim & L. Hellan (eds.), Papers from the Sixth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Tapir: Trondheim.

HOBBS, J. «Towards an understanding of coherence in discourse», in W. Lehnert & M. Ringle (eds.), Strategies for natural-language processing, Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

JAMESON, A. & WAHLSTER, W. «User modeling in anaphora generation: ellipsis and define description», ECAI 222-227.

JARVELLA, R. & KLEIN, W. (eds.) Speech, place, and action: studies of deixis and related topics, Chichester & New York: Wiley.

JOSHI, A. K. ; B. WEBBER & SAG, I. A. (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, Cambridge: University Press.

LO CASCIO, «Temporal deixis and anaphor in sentence and text: finding a reference time», Journal of Italian Linguistics 7: 31-70.

LUST, B. & CLIFFORD, T. «The 3-D study: effects of depth, distance and directionality on childern's acquisition of qnaphora», in J. Pustejovsky & P. Sells (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts: Amherst. [Longer version in B. Lust (ed.), 1986].

MARSLEN-WILSON, W.; LEVY, E. & KOMISARJEVSKY-TYLER, F. «Producing interpretable discourse: the establisment and maintenance of reference» in R. J. Jarvella &W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place and action...

MERLINI, L. «Aspetti semantici e pragmatici di un tipo di anafora lessicale nel testo economico inglese», in E. Siciliani, R. M. Bosinelli & G. Aston (a cura di) La lingua inglese nell' Università, Bari: Adriatica Editrice.

MILLER, G. A. ; BARTLETT, E. J. & HIRST,  W. Anaphora : a theory and its applications to developmental research : final report, submitted to National Institute of Education, New York : Rockefeller Foundation.

MILNER, J.-C. Ordres et raisons de la langue, Paris: Seuil.

MOHANAN, K. P. «Grammatical relations and anaphora in Malayalam», in A. Marantz & T. Stowell (eds.), Papers in Syntax, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 4.

MOHANAN, K. P. «Pronouns in Malayalam», Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11: 67-75.

MURPHY, G. «Understanding anaphora», Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.

PINHAS, J. & LUST, B. «Acquisition of pronominal anaphora in the language of the hearing impaired», in Proceedings of Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, 3, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

von STECHOW, A. «Three local deictics», in R. Jarvella, & W. Klein (eds.) Speech, place, and action...

TASMOWSKI-DE RYCK, L. & VERLUYTEN, S. P. «Linguistic control of pronouns», Journal of Semantics 1: 323- 346

TYLER, L. & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. «The resolution of discourse anaphors: some on-line studies», Text 2-1: 263-291.

WEBBER, B. «So what can we talk about now?», in M. Brady & R. Berwick (eds.), Computational models of discourse, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

WENSKUS, O. Ringkomposition, anaphorish-rekapitulierende Verbindung und anknupfende Wiederholung im hippokratischen Corpus, Frankfurt: Fischer.

YULE, G. «Interpreting anaphora without identifying reference», Journal of Semantics 1: 315-323.

Last modified: 2/8/2006

Please forward questions, comments or suggestions to: Dr. Hélène Perdicoyianni-Paléologou, E-Mail: