Anaphora 2010
< Previous :: Anaphora Index :: Next>

BRISARD, F. «Aspects of virtuality in the meaning of the French imparfait», Linguistics 48-2 : 487-524.

CHIOU, M. NP-anaphora in modern Greek : A partial neo-Gricean pragmatic approach, Newcastle : Cambridge Scholars.

CHIOU, M. & HUANG, Y. «NP-anaphora in modern Greek : A partial neo-Gricean pragmatic approach», Journal of Pragmatics 42-7 : 2036.

COWLES, H. W. ; GARNHAM, A. & SIMNER, J. «Conceptual similarity effects on working memory in sentence contexts : Testing a theory of anaphora», The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63-6 : 1218-1232.

DELOGU, F.; VESPIGNANI, F. & SANFORD, A. J. «Effects of intentionality on sentence and discourse processing : evidence from eye-movement», Journal of Memory and Language 62-4 : 352-379.

DEMOL, A. Les pronoms anaphoriques il et celui-ci, Bruxelles & Paris : De Boeck-Duculot.

DUTTA, K. ; PRAKASH, N. & KAUSHIK, S. «Probabilistic neural network approach to the classification of demonstrative pronouns for indirect anaphora in Hindi», Expert systems with application 37-8 : 5607.

DWIVEDI, V. D. ; PHILLIPS, N. A. ; EINAGEL, S. & BAUM, S. R. «The neural underpinnings of semantic ambiguity and anaphora», Brain Research 18 : 93.

ELBOURNE, P. «On bishop sentences», Natural Language Semantics 18-1 : 65-78.

EVERAERT, M. [et al.] The linguistic enterprise : from knowledge of language to knowledge in linguistics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia : Benjamins.

FOX, B. & THOMPSON, S. «Responses to Wh-Questions in English conversation», Research on Language & Social Interaction 43-2 : 133-156.

GRUTER, T. ; LIEBERMAN, M. & GUALMINI, A. «Acquiring the scope of disjunction and legation in L2 : A  bidirectional study of Learners of Japanese and English», Language Acquisition 17-3 : 127-154.

GUILBERG, M. «Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research», Second Language Research 26-1 : 75-102.

HORACEK, H. (ed.) Natural  language precessin and information systems : 14thInternational Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NL DB 2009, Saarbrücken, Germany, June 24-26, 2009, Berlin : Springer.

HUANG, Ch.-T. J. Between syntax and semantics, New York : Routeledge.

IMAMURA, K. ; SALTO, K. & IZUMI, T. «Discriminative approach to predicate-argument structure analysis with zero-anaphora resolution», Annual Meeting – Association for Computational Linguistics 47 suppl. 85-88.

IONIN, T. & ZUBIZARRETA, M. «Introduction to the Special issue : Selective first language influence and retreat from negative transfer», Second Language research 26-3 : 283-291.

KOORNEEF, A. W. «Looking at anaphora : the psychological reality of primitives of binding models», in M. Everaert (ed.)The linguistic enterprise : from knowledge of language to knowledge in linguistics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia : Benjamins.

KÜHNLEIN, P. ; BENZ, A. & SIDNER, C. L. «Constraints in discourse 2», Amsterdam & Philadelphia : Benjamins.

LACZKO, K. «Demonstrative pronouns in spatial deixis, discourse deixis, and anaphora», Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57-1 : 99-118.

LEVINE, R. D. «The ass camouflage construction : Masks as parasitic heads», Language 88-2 : 265-301.

MASHAL, N. & FAUST, M. «The effect of metaphoricity and presentation style on brain activation during text comprehension», Metaphor and Symbol 25-1 : 19-33.

MAYOL, L. & CLARK, R. «Pronouns in Catalan : Games of partial information and the use of linguistic resources», Journal of Pragmatics 42-3 : 781-799.

MORRILL, G. & VALENTIN, O. «On anaphora and the binding principles in categorial grammar», Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6188 : 176-190.

OH, E. «Recovery from first-language transfer : The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers», Second Language Research 26-3 : 407-439.

PHILLIPS, C. «Syntax at age two : Cross-linguistic differences», Language Acquisition 17-1/2 : 70-120.

PYYKKONEN, P. ; MATTHEWS, D. & JARVIKIVI, J. «Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension : A visual world study of pronoun resolution», Language and Cognitive Processes 25-1 : 115-129.

ROBINSON, J. & KEVOE-FELDMAN, H. «Using full repeats to initiate repair on other’s questions», Research on Language & Social Interaction 43-3 : 232-259.

ROELOFSEN, F. «Condition B effects in two simple steps», Natural Language Semantics 18-2 : 115-140.

ROTHMAN, J. & AMARO, J. C. «What variables condition synatctic transfert? A look at the L3 initial state», Second Language Research  26-2 : 189-216.

SALAZAR ORVIG, A. ; MARCOS, H. ; MORGENSTERN, A. & HASSAN, R. «Dialogical beginnings of anaphora : The use of third person pronouns before the age of 3», Journal of Pragmatics 42-7 : 1842.

SAN GINÉS RUIZ, A. Anaphore et représentatiion diagrammatique : à la recherche de l'automacité, Doctorat du Nouveau Regime,  Université de Paris Panthéon-Sorbonne & Universidad de Granada.

SANCHEZ, L. : CAMACHO, J. & ULLOA, J. «Shipibo-Spanish : Differences in residual transfer at the syntax-morphology and the syntax-pragmatics interfaces», Second Language Research 26-3 : 329-354.

SCHUMACHER, P. ; CONSTEN, M. & KNEES, M. «Constraints on ontology changing complexation processes : Evidence  from event-related brain potentials», Language and Cognitive Processes 25-6 : 840-865.

SCHWITTER, R. «Anaphora resolution involving interactive knowledge acquisition», Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5972 : 36-55.

SEGURA-BEDMAR, I. ; CRESPO, M. & PABLO-SANCHEZ, C. DE «Score-based approach for anaphora resolution in drug-drug interactions documents», in E. Horacek (ed.) Natural  language precessin and information systems : 14thInternational Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NL DB 2009, Saarbrücken, Germany, June 24-26, 2009, Berlin : Springer.

SEGURA-BEDMAR, I. ; CRESPO, M. ; PABLO-SANCHEZ, C. DE & MARTINEZ, P. «Resolving anaphoras for the extraction of drug-drug interaction in pharmacological documents», BMC bioinformatics 11 Suppl. 2 : S1.

SEUREN, A. M. The logic of language, Oxford & New York : Oxford University Press.

SMIT, J.-P. & STEGLICH-PETERSEN, A. «Anaphora and Semantic Innocence», Journal of Semantics 27-1 : 119-124.

TABOADA, M. & WIESEMANN, L. «Subjects and topics in conversation», Journal of Pragmatics 42-7 : 1816-1828.

THORNTON, R. «Verb phrase ellipsis in children’s Answers to Questions», Language Learning and Development 6-1 : 1-31.

VERBUK, A. & ROEPER, T. «How pragmatics and syntax make principle B acquirable», Language Acquisition 17-1/2 : 51-65.

WILKINSON, R. ; BEEKE, S. & MAXIM, J. «Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources : Enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk», Research on Language & Social Interaction 43-1 : 57-84.

YUAN, B. «Domain-wide or variable-dependent vulnerability of the semantics-syntax interface in L2 acquisition? Evidence from wh-words as existential polarity in L2 Chinese grammars», Second Language Research 26-2 : 219-260.

Last modified: 10/21/2010

Please forward questions, comments or suggestions to: Dr. Hélène Perdicoyianni-Paléologou, E-Mail: hperpal@hotmail.com