Anaphora 2001
< Previous :: Anaphora Index :: Next >

ARIEL, M. «Accessibility theory: overview», In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord & W. Spooren (eds), Text representation: linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, Amsterdam: Benjamins.

ASUDEH, A. «Constraints on lingustic coreference: structural vs. pragmatic factors», in Proceedings of the 23rd. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

AZZOUNI, J. «Truth via anaphorically unrestricted quantifiers», Journal of Philosophical Logic 30-4 : 329-354.

BARBU, C. & MITKOV, R. «Evaluation took for rule-based anaphora resolution methods», Annual Meeting – Association For Computational Linguistics 39 : 34-41.

BARTOS, H. «Sound-form non-insertion and the direction of ellipsis», Acta Linguistica Hungarica 48-1/3 : 3-24.

BITTNER, M. «Surface composition as bridging», Journal of Semantics 18-2 : 127-177.

BLACKWELL, S. E. «Testing the Neo-Grecian pragmatic theory of anaphora : the influence of consistency constraints on interpretations of coreference in Spanish», Journal of Pragmatics 33-6 : 901.

BOELLA, G. & LESMO, L. «An approach to anaphora based on mental models» in P. Bouquet (ed.), CONTEXT'01: Third International Conference on Modeling and Using Context, Berlin: Springer Verlag.

BOSCH, P. «Against the identification of anaphora and presupposition», in J. van Kuppevelt and R. Smith (eds), Proceeding of the 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark, September 1-2, 2001.

BOTLEY, S. & McENERY, T. «Proximal and distal demonstratives : a corpus-based studies», Journal of English Linguistics 29-3 : 214-233.

BOWER, G. H. & RINCK, M. «Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models», Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, memory, and Cognition 27-1 : 81-98.

BYRON, D. K. «The uncommon denominator: a proposal for consistent reporting of pronoun resolution results», Computational Linguisitcs Special Issue on Anaphora and Ellipsis Resolution, 27-4: 569-577.

CECHETTO, C. ; CHERCHIA G. & GUASTI, M. T. Semantic interfaces : reference, anaphora, and aspect, Stanford :CSLI.

CIENKI, A. J. ; LUKA, B. L. & SMITH, M. B. Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure, Stanford : CSLI.

COLE, P. ; HERMON, G. & HUANG, Ch.-T. J. Long-distance reflexives, San Diego : Academic Press.

CORNISH, F. «Anaphora, text, and the construction of discourse: a practical application», in L. Degand, Y. Bestgen, W. Spooren & L. van Waes (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to discourse, VU Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek; Münster: Nodus Publikationen.

DEPLANTE, M. «On null complement anaphora in Spanish and Italian», Probus 13-2 : 193-221.

DJENAR, D. N. «Indonesian ‘locative’ pronouns : deictic or anaphoric?», Australian Journal of Linguistics 2&-1 : 49-71.

EGG, M. ; KOLLER, A. & NIEHREN, J. «The constraint language for lambda structures», Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 : 457-485.

ELBOURNE, P. «E-Type anaphora as NP-Deletion», Natural Language Semantics 9-3 : 241-288.

EVANS, R. «Applying machine learning toward an automatic classification of 'It'», Journal of Literary and Linguistic Computing 16-1: 45-57.

EWING, M. «Reference and recovery in Cirebon Javanese», Australian Journal of Linguistics 21-1 : 25-47.

FERNANDO, T. «A type reduction from proof-conditional to dynamic semantics», Journal of Philosophical Logic 30-2 : 121-153.

FORBES, K.; MILTSAKAKI, E.; PRASAD, R.; SARKAR, A.; JOSHI, A. & WEBBER, B. «Discourse parsing with a lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar», in ESSLLI 2001 workshop on information structure, discourse structure and discourse semantics, Helsinski, Finland.

FOSSARD, M. Aspects cognitifs de l'anaphore pronominale : approche psycholinguistique et ouverture neuropsycholinguistique auprès de deux patientes atteintes de démence type Alzheimer, Doctorat du Nouveau Régime, Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.

FRAZIER, L. «The pronoun bias effect strikes again : a reply to Pynte and Colonna», Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30-6 : 601-604.

GARDENT, C. & WEBBER, B. «Towards the use of automated reasoning in discourse disambiguation», Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10-4.

GARDNHAM, A. Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.

GELBUKH, A. (ed.) Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing : Second International Conference, CICLing 2001, Mexico City, February 18-24, 2001, Berlin & New York : Springer.

GELDBACH, S. Anaphernresolution und Übersetzung in der Sprachrichtung Russisch-Deutsch, Frankfurt : Lang.

HERLOFSKY, W. «Icons, anaphors, and the evolution of language», in Fischer & Nänny (eds.), The motivated sign, iconicity in language and literature 2, Amsterdam: Benjamins.

HOBBS, J. «Abduction in natural language understanding», in L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell.

HORNSTEIN, N. & SAN MARTIN, I. «Obviation as anti-control», control and binding, Univeristy of Maryland, College Park, MD.

HU, J. & PAN, H. «Processing local coherence of discourse in centering theory», in Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, City University of Hing Kong, Hong Kong.

HU, J. & PAN, H. «OT models and anaphoric binding», Journal of Foreign Languages 1: 24-31.

JAGER, G. «Anaphora and quantification in categorial grammar», Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2014 : 70-89.

KIBBLE, R. «A reformulation of rule of centering theory», Computational Linguistics 27-4: 579-587.

KING, J. C. Complex demonstratives: a quantificational account, contemporary philosophical monographs, 2, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

KLEIBER, G. L'anaphore associative, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

KLEIBER, G. «Le possessif via l'anaphore associative», in L. Tasmowski (ed.), The Expression of Possession in Romance and German Languages, Cluj-Napoca, Clusium & in Maria Luz Casal Silva & alii (eds) (2000), La Linguistica Francesa en Espana Camino del Siclo XXI, Saint Jacques de Compostelle, Arrecife, 1. [Translated in Spanish in J.-C. Anscombre & G. Kleiber (eds), Problemas de Semantica y Referencia, Oviedo: Publicaciones Universidad de Oviedo.]

KLEIBER, G. «Les référents évolutifs: au large et à l'étroit», in W. De Mulder & C. Schnedecker (éds.), Les référents évolutifs entre linguistique et philosophie, Paris: Klincksieck.

KLEIBER, G. «Anaphore associative et lexique», in M. Prandi & P. Ramat (éds), Semiotica e linguistica, Materiali Linguistici Universita di Pavia 32, Milan: FrancoAngeli.

KLEIBER, G. «Déterminants indéfinis ou Quand les faibles jouent aux forts», in X. Blanco, P.-A. Buvet & Z. Gavrilidou (éds.), Détermination et formalisation, Linguisticae Investigationes Supplementa 23, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.

KLEIBER, G. «Regards sur l'anaphore et la Giveness Hierarchy», in H. Kronning, C. Noren, B. Novèn, G. Ransbo, L.-G. Sundvell & B. Svane (eds.), Langage et référence. Mélanges offerts à Kerstin Jonasson à l'occasion de ses 60 ans, Uppsala University, Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

KRONROD, A. & ENGEL, O. «Accessibility theory and referring expressions in newspaper headlines», Journal of Pragmatics 33: 683-699.

KRUIJFF-KORBAYOV, I. & WEBBER, B. «Concession, implicature and alternative sets», in Fourth International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

KRUIJFF-KORBAYOV, I. & WEBBER, B. «Information structure and the semantics of 'otherwise'», in ESSLLI'2001 workshop of information structure, discourse structure and discourse semantics, Helsinski, Finland.

LAMBRECHT, K. «Dislocation», in M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: an international handbook, (Handbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswisseschaft, 20), vol. 20, Berlin & New York: W. de Guyter.

LANCE, M. «The logical structure of linguistic commitment III Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility», Journal of Philosophical Logic 30-5 : 439-464.

LASNIK, H. «The position of the accusative subject in the accusative-infinitive Construction», Working Papers of International Symposium on Non-Nominative Subjects: 1-10.

LASNIK, H. «Derivation and representation in modern transformational syntax», in M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds.), Handbook of syntactic theory, Oxford: Blackwell.

LASNIK, H. «Subjects, objects and the EPP», in W. D. Davies & S. Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and other subjects: grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

LEGENDRE, G. ; GRIMSHAW, J. G. & VIKNER, S. Optimality – theoretic syntax, Cambridge (Mass.) : MIT Press.

LEITH, D. M. Anaphora and the bilingual, D. Phil. Oxford University.

LINNELL, J. «Chinese as a second/foreign language teaching and research : changing classroom contexts and teacher choices», Language Teaching Research 5-1 : 54-81.

LUDLOW, P. «Metaphysical austerity and the problems of temporal and modal anaphora», Nous 35 : 211-227.

MARTÍNEZ-BARCO, P. Resolución computacional de la anáfora en Diálogos: Estructura del Discurso y Conocimiento Lingüístico, Ph. D. thesis, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

MATSUO, A. & DUFFIELD, N. «VP-ellipsis and anaphora in child language acquisition», Language Acquisition  9-4 : 301-327.

McDONALD, C. Anaphora resolution, 3rd Year ACL Project 2000/2001, unpublished manuscript.

MEYER, J. & DALE R. «Issues in anaphoric annotation: the case of encyclopaedic animal descriptions», in Proceedings of the 2001 Australasian Natural Language Processing Workshop, 20th April, Macquaire University, Sydney, Australia.

MITKOV, R. «Towards a more consistent and comprehensive evaluation of anaphora resolution algorithms and systems», Applied Artificial Intelligence 15-3: 253-276.

MITKOV, R. «Outstanding issues in anaphora resolution», in A. Gelbkh (ed.), in Proceedings of the second international conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (CICLing), Mexico City.

De MULDER, W.; VET, C. & VETTERS, C. (eds.) Anaphores pronominales et nominales. Études pragma-sémantiques, Amsterdam & New-York: Rodopi.

MÜLLER, Chr. & STRUBE, M. «Annotating anaphoric and bridging relations with MMAX», in Proceedings of the 2nd SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue, Aelborg, Denmark, 1-2 september 2001.

NARIYAMA, S. «Multiple argument ellipsis resolution in Japanese», in Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit VIII, Spain.

NORDLIE, J. ; DOPKINS, S. & JOHNSON, M. «Words in a sentence become less accessible when a anaphor is resolved», Memory and Cognition 29-2 : 355-262.

NOVERINI DJENAR, D. «Indonesian “locative” pronouns : deictic or anaphoric?», Australian Journal of Linguistics 21-1 : 49-71.

ORASAN, C. & EVANS, R. «Learning to identify animate references», in Proceedings of the workshop on computational natural language learning (CoNLL-2001). ACL-2001.

PALOMAR, M.; FERRÁNDEZ, A.; MORENO, L.; MARTÍNEZ-BARCO, P.; SAIW-NOEDA, M. & MUÑOZ, R. «An algorithm for anaphora resolution in Spanish texts», Computational Linguistics 27-4: 545-568.

PAN, H. «Why the blocking effect?», in P. Cole, G. Hermon & J. C.-T. Huang (eds.), Long distance reflexives, syntax and semantics series, New York: Academic Press.

PAN, H. & J. Hu «An optimality-theoretic account of Chinese complex reflexive ta-ziji '3s-self», in Proceedings of the 16th international lexical-functional grammar (LFG) conference, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 25-27.

PERDICOYIANNI-PALÉOLOGOU, H. «Le concept de l'anaphore, cataphore et déixis en linguistique française», Revue Québecqoise de Linguistique 29: 55-77.

PERDICOYIANNI-PALÉOLOGOU, H. «The use of autos and ipse in Origen's Homelies on Jeremy, as translated by St. Jerome», Philologie im Netz 17: 1-15.

PIRES, A. «Movement and binding in Portugueuse», in J. Camps a C. R. Wiltshire (eds.), Linguistic symposium on Romance Languages (30: 2000: Gainesville) Romance syntax, semantics and L2 acquisition: selected papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Gainesville, Florida, February 2000 (Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science, Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory 216), Amsterdam : Benjamins.

PIWEK, P. Accents, anaphors and implicatures in DRT. CL-FG seminar, King's College London, May 29 2001.

RADVANSKY, G. A. & COPELAND, D. E. «Working memory and situation model updating», Memory and Cognition 29-8 : 1073-1080.

ROLFE, L. «Van Voek : anaphora and conceptual structure», Word - New York – International - Linguistic Association and Linguistics Circle of New York 52-2 : 313-315.

SALMON ALT, S. Référence et dialogue finalisé : De la linguistique à un modele opérationnel, Doctorat du Nouveau Regime, Université de Nancy I.

SANFORD, A. J. ; WILLIAMS, C. & FAY, N. «When being included is being excluded : a note on complement set focus and the inclusion relation», Memory and Cognition 29-8 : 1096-1101.

SCHAUER, H. & HAHN, U. «Anaphoric cues for coherence relations», in G. Angelova et alii (eds.), Proceedings of the International Euroconference "Recent advances in natural language processing" - RANLP 2001,Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria, 5-7 September 2001, Shoumen: Incoma.

SCHIFFRIN, D.; TANNEN, D. & HAMILTON, H. E. (eds.) The handbook of discourse analysis, Oxford: Blackwell.

SCHNEDECKER, C. «Couples anaphoriques et cohésion discursive: quand l'un / l'autre font bande à part», in W. De Mulder, C. Vet & C.Vetters (eds.), Anaphores pronominales et nominales...

SOUESME, J.-C. Anaphores nominale et verbale : actes du colloque, Nice, 16 et 17 mars 2001, Nice : Faculté des lettres de Nice.

STIRLING, L. «The multi-functionality of anaphoric expressions : a typological perspective», Australian Journal of Linguistics 21-1 : 7-23.

SUGIURA, S. Bound variables and coreferential pronouns : zero and overt pronouns in Japanese and English, Tokyo : Hituzi Syobo.

TAO, L. «Switch reference and zero anaphora: emergent reference in discourse processing», in A. Cienki, B. J. Luca & M. B. Smith (eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistics structure, Stanford: CSLI.

TETRAULT, J. R. «A corpus-based evaluation of centering and pronoun resolution», Computational Linguistics 27-4: 507-520.

TURNER, E. H. & TURNER, R. M. «Representing the graphics context to support understanding plural anaphora in multi-modal interfaces», Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2116 : 330-342.

WEBBER, B. «Computational aspects of discourse and dialogue», in D. Schriffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, Oxford: Blackwell.

WEBBER, B.; KNOTT, A. & JOSHI, A. «Multiple discourse connectives in a lexicalized grammar for discourse», in H. Bunt, R. Muskens & E. Thijsse (eds.), Computing meaning, Volume 2, in Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 77, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Last modified: 21/10/2010

Please forward questions, comments or suggestions to: Dr. Hélène Perdicoyianni-Paléologou, E-Mail: