Text representation: linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
«Accessibility theory: overview», In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord & W. Spooren (eds),Proceedings of the 23rd. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
«Constraints on lingustic coreference: structural vs. pragmatic factors», inAZZOUNI, J. «Truth via anaphorically unrestricted quantifiers», Journal of Philosophical Logic 30-4 : 329-354.
BARBU, C. & MITKOV, R. «Evaluation took for rule-based anaphora resolution methods», Annual Meeting – Association For Computational Linguistics 39 : 34-41.
BARTOS, H. «Sound-form non-insertion and the direction of ellipsis», Acta Linguistica Hungarica 48-1/3 : 3-24.
BITTNER, M. «Surface composition as bridging», Journal of Semantics 18-2 : 127-177.
BLACKWELL, S. E. «Testing the Neo-Grecian pragmatic theory of anaphora : the influence of consistency constraints on interpretations of coreference in Spanish», Journal of Pragmatics 33-6 : 901.
CONTEXT'01: Third International Conference on Modeling and Using Context, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
«An approach to anaphora based on mental models» in P. Bouquet (ed.),Proceeding of the 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark, September 1-2, 2001.
«Against the identification of anaphora and presupposition», in J. van Kuppevelt and R. Smith (eds),BOTLEY, S. & McENERY, T. «Proximal and distal demonstratives : a corpus-based studies», Journal of English Linguistics 29-3 : 214-233.
BOWER, G. H. & RINCK, M. «Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models», Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, memory, and Cognition 27-1 : 81-98.
Computational Linguisitcs Special Issue on Anaphora and Ellipsis Resolution, 27-4: 569-577.
«The uncommon denominator: a proposal for consistent reporting of pronoun resolution results»,CECHETTO, C. ; CHERCHIA G. & GUASTI, M. T. Semantic interfaces : reference, anaphora, and aspect, Stanford :CSLI.
CIENKI, A. J. ; LUKA, B. L. & SMITH, M. B. Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure, Stanford : CSLI.
COLE, P. ; HERMON, G. & HUANG, Ch.-T. J. Long-distance reflexives, San Diego : Academic Press.
Multidisciplinary approaches to discourse, VU Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek; Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
«Anaphora, text, and the construction of discourse: a practical application», in L. Degand, Y. Bestgen, W. Spooren & L. van Waes (eds.),DEPLANTE, M. «On null complement anaphora in Spanish and Italian», Probus 13-2 : 193-221.
DJENAR, D. N. «Indonesian ‘locative’ pronouns : deictic or anaphoric?», Australian Journal of Linguistics 2&-1 : 49-71.
EGG, M. ; KOLLER, A. & NIEHREN, J. «The constraint language for lambda structures», Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 : 457-485.
ELBOURNE, P. «E-Type anaphora as NP-Deletion», Natural Language Semantics 9-3 : 241-288.
Journal of Literary and Linguistic Computing 16-1: 45-57.
«Applying machine learning toward an automatic classification of 'It'»,EWING, M. «Reference and recovery in Cirebon Javanese», Australian Journal of Linguistics 21-1 : 25-47.
FERNANDO, T. «A type reduction from proof-conditional to dynamic semantics», Journal of Philosophical Logic 30-2 : 121-153.
ESSLLI 2001 workshop on information structure, discourse structure and discourse semantics, Helsinski, Finland.
«Discourse parsing with a lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar», inFOSSARD, M. Aspects cognitifs de l'anaphore pronominale : approche psycholinguistique et ouverture neuropsycholinguistique auprès de deux patientes atteintes de démence type Alzheimer, Doctorat du Nouveau Régime, Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.
FRAZIER, L. «The pronoun bias effect strikes again : a reply to Pynte and Colonna», Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30-6 : 601-604.
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10-4.
«Towards the use of automated reasoning in discourse disambiguation»,Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
GELBUKH, A. (ed.) Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing : Second International Conference, CICLing 2001, Mexico City, February 18-24, 2001, Berlin & New York : Springer.
GELDBACH, S. Anaphernresolution und Übersetzung in der Sprachrichtung Russisch-Deutsch, Frankfurt : Lang.
«Icons, anaphors, and the evolution of language», in Fischer & Nänny (eds.), The motivated sign, iconicity in language and literature 2, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Handbook of pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell.
«Abduction in natural language understanding», in L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.),HORNSTEIN, N. & SAN MARTIN, I. «Obviation as anti-control», control and binding, Univeristy of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, City University of Hing Kong, Hong Kong.
«Processing local coherence of discourse in centering theory», inJournal of Foreign Languages 1: 24-31.
«OT models and anaphoric binding»,JAGER, G. «Anaphora and quantification in categorial grammar», Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2014 : 70-89.
Computational Linguistics 27-4: 579-587.
«A reformulation of rule of centering theory»,Complex demonstratives: a quantificational account, contemporary philosophical monographs, 2, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
L'anaphore associative, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
The Expression of Possession in Romance and German Languages, Cluj-Napoca, Clusium & in Maria Luz Casal Silva & alii (eds) (2000), La Linguistica Francesa en Espana Camino del Siclo XXI, Saint Jacques de Compostelle, Arrecife, 1. [Translated in Spanish in J.-C. Anscombre & G. Kleiber (eds), Problemas de Semantica y Referencia, Oviedo: Publicaciones Universidad de Oviedo.]
«Le possessif via l'anaphore associative», in L. Tasmowski (ed.),Les référents évolutifs entre linguistique et philosophie, Paris: Klincksieck.
«Les référents évolutifs: au large et à l'étroit», in W. De Mulder & C. Schnedecker (éds.),Semiotica e linguistica, Materiali Linguistici Universita di Pavia 32, Milan: FrancoAngeli.
«Anaphore associative et lexique», in M. Prandi & P. Ramat (éds),Détermination et formalisation, Linguisticae Investigationes Supplementa 23, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
«Déterminants indéfinis ou Quand les faibles jouent aux forts», in X. Blanco, P.-A. Buvet & Z. Gavrilidou (éds.),Langage et référence. Mélanges offerts à Kerstin Jonasson à l'occasion de ses 60 ans, Uppsala University, Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
«Regards sur l'anaphore et la Giveness Hierarchy», in H. Kronning, C. Noren, B. Novèn, G. Ransbo, L.-G. Sundvell & B. Svane (eds.),Journal of Pragmatics 33: 683-699.
«Accessibility theory and referring expressions in newspaper headlines»,Fourth International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
«Concession, implicature and alternative sets», inESSLLI'2001 workshop of information structure, discourse structure and discourse semantics, Helsinski, Finland.
«Information structure and the semantics of 'otherwise'», inLanguage typology and language universals: an international handbook, (Handbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswisseschaft, 20), vol. 20, Berlin & New York: W. de Guyter.
«Dislocation», in M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (eds.),LANCE, M. «The logical structure of linguistic commitment III Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility», Journal of Philosophical Logic 30-5 : 439-464.
Working Papers of International Symposium on Non-Nominative Subjects: 1-10.
«The position of the accusative subject in the accusative-infinitive Construction»,Handbook of syntactic theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
«Derivation and representation in modern transformational syntax», in M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds.),Objects and other subjects: grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
«Subjects, objects and the EPP», in W. D. Davies & S. Dubinsky (eds.),LEGENDRE, G. ; GRIMSHAW, J. G. & VIKNER, S. Optimality – theoretic syntax, Cambridge (Mass.) : MIT Press.
LEITH, D. M. Anaphora and the bilingual, D. Phil. Oxford University.
LINNELL, J. «Chinese as a second/foreign language teaching and research : changing classroom contexts and teacher choices», Language Teaching Research 5-1 : 54-81.
LUDLOW, P. «Metaphysical austerity and the problems of temporal and modal anaphora», Nous 35 : 211-227.
Resolución computacional de la anáfora en Diálogos: Estructura del Discurso y Conocimiento Lingüístico, Ph. D. thesis, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
MATSUO, A. & DUFFIELD, N. «VP-ellipsis and anaphora in child language acquisition», Language Acquisition 9-4 : 301-327.
Anaphora resolution, 3rd Year ACL Project 2000/2001, unpublished manuscript.
Proceedings of the 2001 Australasian Natural Language Processing Workshop, 20th April, Macquaire University, Sydney, Australia.
«Issues in anaphoric annotation: the case of encyclopaedic animal descriptions», inApplied Artificial Intelligence 15-3: 253-276.
«Towards a more consistent and comprehensive evaluation of anaphora resolution algorithms and systems»,Proceedings of the second international conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (CICLing), Mexico City.
«Outstanding issues in anaphora resolution», in A. Gelbkh (ed.), inAnaphores pronominales et nominales. Études pragma-sémantiques, Amsterdam & New-York: Rodopi.
(eds.)Proceedings of the 2nd SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue, Aelborg, Denmark, 1-2 september 2001.
«Annotating anaphoric and bridging relations with MMAX», inProceedings of Machine Translation Summit VIII, Spain.
«Multiple argument ellipsis resolution in Japanese», inNORDLIE, J. ; DOPKINS, S. & JOHNSON, M. «Words in a sentence become less accessible when a anaphor is resolved», Memory and Cognition 29-2 : 355-262.
NOVERINI DJENAR, D. «Indonesian “locative” pronouns : deictic or anaphoric?», Australian Journal of Linguistics 21-1 : 49-71.
Proceedings of the workshop on computational natural language learning (CoNLL-2001). ACL-2001.
«Learning to identify animate references», inComputational Linguistics 27-4: 545-568.
«An algorithm for anaphora resolution in Spanish texts»,Long distance reflexives, syntax and semantics series, New York: Academic Press.
«Why the blocking effect?», in P. Cole, G. Hermon & J. C.-T. Huang (eds.),Proceedings of the 16th international lexical-functional grammar (LFG) conference, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 25-27.
«An optimality-theoretic account of Chinese complex reflexive ta-ziji '3s-self», inRevue Québecqoise de Linguistique 29: 55-77.
«Le concept de l'anaphore, cataphore et déixis en linguistique française»,Philologie im Netz 17: 1-15.
«The use of autos and ipse in Origen's Homelies on Jeremy, as translated by St. Jerome»,PIRES, A. «Movement and binding in Portugueuse», in J. Camps a C. R. Wiltshire (eds.), Linguistic symposium on Romance Languages (30: 2000: Gainesville) Romance syntax, semantics and L2 acquisition: selected papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Gainesville, Florida, February 2000 (Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science, Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory 216), Amsterdam : Benjamins.
Accents, anaphors and implicatures in DRT. CL-FG seminar, King's College London, May 29 2001.
RADVANSKY, G. A. & COPELAND, D. E. «Working memory and situation model updating», Memory and Cognition 29-8 : 1073-1080.
ROLFE, L. «Van Voek : anaphora and conceptual structure», Word - New York – International - Linguistic Association and Linguistics Circle of New York 52-2 : 313-315.
SALMON ALT, S. Référence et dialogue finalisé : De la linguistique à un modele opérationnel, Doctorat du Nouveau Regime, Université de Nancy I.
SANFORD, A. J. ; WILLIAMS, C. & FAY, N. «When being included is being excluded : a note on complement set focus and the inclusion relation», Memory and Cognition 29-8 : 1096-1101.
Proceedings of the International Euroconference "Recent advances in natural language processing" - RANLP 2001,Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria, 5-7 September 2001, Shoumen: Incoma.
«Anaphoric cues for coherence relations», in G. Angelova et alii (eds.),The handbook of discourse analysis, Oxford: Blackwell.
(eds.)Anaphores pronominales et nominales...
«Couples anaphoriques et cohésion discursive: quand l'un / l'autre font bande à part», in W. De Mulder, C. Vet & C.Vetters (eds.),SOUESME, J.-C. Anaphores nominale et verbale : actes du colloque, Nice, 16 et 17 mars 2001, Nice : Faculté des lettres de Nice.
STIRLING, L. «The multi-functionality of anaphoric expressions : a typological perspective», Australian Journal of Linguistics 21-1 : 7-23.
SUGIURA, S. Bound variables and coreferential pronouns : zero and overt pronouns in Japanese and English, Tokyo : Hituzi Syobo.
Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistics structure, Stanford: CSLI.
«Switch reference and zero anaphora: emergent reference in discourse processing», in A. Cienki, B. J. Luca & M. B. Smith (eds.),Computational Linguistics 27-4: 507-520.
«A corpus-based evaluation of centering and pronoun resolution»,TURNER, E. H. & TURNER, R. M. «Representing the graphics context to support understanding plural anaphora in multi-modal interfaces», Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2116 : 330-342.
The handbook of discourse analysis, Oxford: Blackwell.
«Computational aspects of discourse and dialogue», in D. Schriffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (eds.),Computing meaning, Volume 2, in Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 77, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
«Multiple discourse connectives in a lexicalized grammar for discourse», in H. Bunt, R. Muskens & E. Thijsse (eds.),Last modified: 21/10/2010