BAUDRY, J. & CARON, P. Problèmes de cohesion syntaxiques de 1550 à 1720: actes du VIe colloque international du GEHLF, avril 1996, Université de Limoges, Limoges : PULIM.

BEVERSDORF, D. Q.; ANDERSON, J. M.; MANNING, S. E.; ANDERSON, S. L.; NORDGREN, R. E.; FELOPULOS, G. J.; NADEAU, S. E.; HEILMAN, K. M. & BAUMAN, M. L. «The effect of semantic and emotional context on written recall for verbal language in high functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder», Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 65-5 : 685-692.

CILIBERTI, A. «Egocentric vs. self-denying communication in an asymmetric event», in S. Cmejrková et al. (eds), Dialogue analysis V, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 29-38.

COLLINS, C. J. «Cohesion in James 1: 19-27», Journal of Translation and Textlinguistics 10: 80-88.

EWING-COBBS, L.; BROOKSHIRE, B. ; SCOTT, M. A. & FLETCHER, J. M. «Children's narratives following traumatic brain injury: linguistic structure, cohesion, and thematic recall», Brain and Language 61-3: 395-419.

GOLDIN-MEADOW, S. «The development of gesture and speech as an integrated system», New Directions Child Development 79 : 29-42.

KNOTT, A. & SANDERS, T. «The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: an exploration of two languages», Journal of Pragmatics 30: 135-175.

LAGERWERF, L.  Causal connectives have presuppositions: effects on coherence and discourse structure, Doctoral dissertation. LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics 10), The Hague: Holland Academic.

LENK, U. «Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation», Journal of Pragmatics 30: 245-257.

LORENZ, G. «Overstatement in advanced learners’ writing: stylistic aspects of adjective intensification», in S. Granger (ed.), Learner English on xomputer, London: Addison Wesley Longman, 53-66.

MORI, A. R. & CONSORTI, F. «Integration of clinical information across patient reecords: a comparison of mechanisms used to enforce semantic coherence», IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2-4 : 243-253.

PANDER MAAT, H. «Classifying negative coherence relations on the basis of linguistic evidence», Journal of Pragmatics 30: 177-204.

PÉPIN, L. La coherence textuelle, Laval (Québec): Beauchemin.

RODRIGUES, J. M.; TROMBERT-PAVIOT, B.; BAUD, R.; WAGNER, J. & MEUSNIER-CARRIOT, F. «Galen-In-Use : using artificial intelligence terminology tools to improve the linguistic coherence of a national coding system for surgical procedures», Medinfo 9 (Pt 1) : 623-627.

SCHRIEFERS, H.; FRIEDERICI, A. D. & ROSE, U. «Context effects in visual word recognition: lexical relatedness and syntactic context», Memory and Cognition, 26-6 : 1292-1303.

TERNES, C. M. (ed.) Oratio soluta-Oratio numerosa: les mécanismes linguistiques de cohesion et de rupture dans la prose latine [actes des Huitièmes «Rencontres scientifiques de Luxembourg» 1995], Luxembourg : Centre Alexandre-Wiltheim.

WEISS, S. & RAPPELSBERGER, P. «Left frontal EEG coherence reflects modality independent language processes», Brain Topography 1-1 : 33-42.

WENNERSTROM, A. «Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: a study of Chinese speakers of English», Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: Seitenzahlen.

WILSON, D. & MATSUI, T. «Recent approaches to bridging: truth, coherence, relevance», UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 173-200.

SI AMEUR, L. Étude de la coherence et de la négation dans un système de representation pour le traitement des langues, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Grenoble III.

Last modified: 21/01/2013